Sexual abuse of animals in Denmark – another article

Google English translation of this article below.

Stop sexual abuse of animals (Forbid zoophilia in Denmark!)

Under the title “Stop sexual abuse of animals” puts DOSO – with 22 Danish animal protection organizations in the back – focus on a change in the law, so it is no longer allowed to have sex with animals. On April 1, 2014, Sweden introduced a total ban, but Denmark is lagging behind and needs to be addressed.

A large majority of the Danish people want a ban in place, but a majority of politicians disagree.

They refer to the Animal Welfare Act are adequate if the animal victims of the sexual act.

DOSOs President Peter Mollerup, has for several years worked politically in order to change the law. He does not believe that the Animal Protection Act is wide because:

– Sex with animals very rarely get caught. It is only the very nearest of which is aware of the sexual activities, but when it is allowed, so are they doing nothing.

A ban would animate family, friends and neighbors to be active – eg. go to the police. With a ban on sexual activity, would snap a photo with your phone or a video to be evidence that it is the act itself, which is prohibited.

– National Police investigation and veterinarians’ reports are not sufficient in cases of sex with animals. If the animal is harmed and taken to a veterinarian, it is extremely difficult for the vet to prove that the physical and psychological harm comes from sexual activities.

– We know that people preferred the ban was introduced. DOSO counts approximately 130,000 members and supporting members, and it is on their behalf, we are once again trying to focus on the unfairness of that one can make sexual abuse of animals, without it having some impact, says Peter Mollerup.

Recent studies show that animals have an emotional life, which in many ways comparable to humans. Animals can not speak out when their dignity and integrity violated. The sexual activity is often accompanied by anxiety, pain and suffering of animals, just as from studies by many animals harmed psychologically and physically – especially after repeated or prolonged abuse.

We urge food minister Dan Jorgensen to take rapid action, so you can get in Denmark a law that prohibits people have sex with animals. Just as we have in both Sweden and Norway.

Scroll to the bottom of this page to sign up!

You can also find us on Facebook here: https://www.facebook.com/Forbydzoofili

or here https://www.facebook.com/groups/316870558485041/?fref=ts

A short summary:

In Denmark, it is allowed two have sex with animals.

Scientists do not believe att animals are lidelser, but new research har specimen thatthey faktisk do Suffer, botheration mentally and PHYSICALLY.

Therefore we need-to change the law så kan criminalize and punish the people som sexually abuse animals.

If you agree with this, please sign our petition.

A Majority of the politikerne in the Danish Parliament are not educated as two the pain and lidelser att animals endure når humans force sig on dem. Therefore they feelthat we do not need a special law for the sexual activities. Accor ding to our animal welfare law animals must be treated Properly and be protected in the best possible way against pain, lidelser, distress, lasting harm and of substantial disadvantage ‘. Only tabloid er specimen injuries til animal, you can punish the Perpetrator.

This is problematic, fordi many of the animals som abused and hurt, will never be seen by a vet. Because selvom it is legal two have sex with animals, it is not somethingthat people are proud to share with others. And since it is illegal two hurt the animal, they will not take an injured animal til vet, out of fear of being straffes whenthey be faktisk hurt it. The animals are in no position to say no to being abused. We have som sina voice. Just like having sex with children som er Unable to consent, animals are the unable two provide sina consent. And the fact thatthey do not fight back, does not mean they are not hurt. Please sign two help us help the animals.

Do we need a ban on sodomy / bestiality ?:

Lene Kattrup, veterinarian and member of the Council of Ethics.

The article is an extended version of an article published in the DOG, August 2011 entitled “Is there a need for a ban?”

The very question and the ethics attitude to whether you think we need a ban on sodomy will depend on whether it is based on information from people who are even using animals for sex, that is, they take into account the animals or, if more attention is based on studies of the physical and psychological harm to the animals and talks with owners to the animals that have been used sexually. It will give a somewhat different picture, and it helps to explain the disagreement that exists in the area – even among professionals / academics. , in an article entitled “Sex with animals – well why not?” (from www.videnskab. com) argue two researchers that we should be more positive about the human use of animals for sex, while others think the opposite.

In 2007, the 125 veterinarians example. a letter to parliament with a call for a ban. The debate on the topic has flared up again after TV2 in April showed scenes of a man’s sexual abuse of some goats and a couple’s lending of their male for sexanvendelse.

Parliament must in the fall to decide on a proposal to ban animal sex / sodomy. In 2007, a vote that only SF and DF wanted a ban, while about 70-80% of people prefer a ban. The topic includes some important ethical issues affecting our / society dyresyn. Moreover, the question of whether it is ethically acceptable if we are in this field dispense with our principle that sex is only acceptable between equal individuals / people, which is given fully informed consent. (It can be an animal never give).

Is there a limit to how and to what we have to use our animals? assessment of whether we consider it ethically acceptable to use animals for sex, will depend on our background and values, especially of our humanity, dyresyn and nature. Whether we have an anthropocentric (human-centered) view of life centered on human beings superior to animals and nature that is primarily seen as an instrument / tool to meet people’s needs, and appreciated from this. Or if we have more regards man as part of nature and the animals that we respect and attaches a great value in itself.

In the first group there is a preponderance of benefit sufferers who are mainly interested in the benefits in terms of what benefits the people. Duty sufferers, which dominates the second group, weighting certain overriding principles such. animal dignity, a lower limit on how you can afford to treat animals any purpose and that animals should not be abused or exposed to anxiety and pain.

Are you nytteetiker you can easily get to that a sexual use of animals can be allowed. For most nytteetikeres he provided however, that animals are not harmed and / or subjected to coercion, violence and pain. But the question is whether it will no longer be the rule than the exception that the animals molested and harmed in connection with their utilization for sex, so we do to protect them should impose a ban on sodomy as an addition to the Animal Welfare Act.

How to use animals, examples animals sexanvendes in many different ways. There used to provide objects for example. sticks, broom handle, knives and pipes for damage to the animal with. In addition, the unintended pain addition and / or physical damage. There may also be the case that the animal used carefully and not damaged or added pain. few examples: · A veterinarian oversees a mare who is defeated and bleeding from the anus. He estimates that in the case of sexual use of the animal, but declares nothing. · In the case of sexual abuse of goats that were displayed (hidden camera) in TV healed damage both around and inside the goat’s vagina (vaginal) after each one to two weeks. (One of the animals has today permanent damage and a deformed outer vagina due. Repeated use).They often stand with an arched back as signs of pain and discomfort when the owner comes and takes them behind.

The police have nothing to stand despite the perpetrator’s identity is probably known, because we do not have a ban · A woman came home and found her husband in the middle of intercourse with the family’s four year old terrier that while whined and howled. She took pictures of the act with his cell phone, and the man can look forward to a fine for animal cruelty, because it happened in a country where it is forbidden to have sex with animals. A pregnant cat found with a stick that pierced vagina and almost through the back. It survives after surgery. · Male dog used anally, damages of anus sphincter and chronic thickened ears